OutKick89%

College football national champion who wore wigs in fraud scheme pleads guilty to charges 3%

By Ryan Gaydos0%

4/28/2026, 4:18:43 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 11 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Availability Heuristic, and Primacy Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 26.7% saturation with 85 hits. Analysis detected 281 faulty-reasoning hits from 318 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 14.2% and a BS Rank of 3% (21,353 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 97.60% of the article peer group.

Former Alabama Crimson Tide defensive tackle Luther Davis pleaded guilty on Monday to defrauding investors by impersonating NFL players. 
Davis, 37, entered guilty pleas in federal court in Atlanta to conspiracy to commit wire fraud and aggravated identity theft charges. 
CJ Evins, 29, who was accused of executing the scheme with Davis, also pleaded guilty to the two charges. 
ZERO BS. 
JUST DAKICH. 
TAKE THE DON'T @ ME PODCAST ON THE ROAD. 
DOWNLOAD NOW! 
The men used fake bank accounts and email accounts to convince lenders they were either acting on behalf of professional athletes or were the athletes themselves, Assistant U.S. 
Attorney C. 
Brock Brockington said in court. 
They also sought to impersonate higher-profile players with bigger contracts, he said. 
Davis wore disguises on multiple video calls with potential investors in 2024 and pretended to be three different NFL players. 
Davis wore makeup and a wig once, a wig a second time and a do-rag style head covering on a third call, according to prosecutors. 
CLICK HERE FOR MORE SPORTS COVERAGE ON FOXNEWS.COM 
The fraud scheme netted $20 million from fraudulent loans that Davis and Evins used to buy real estate, jewelry and cars, according to the complaint. 
Security for a players’ union learned that fraudulent player contracts had been used as collateral, Brockington said. 
The U.S. 
Attorney’s Office in Atlanta filed a criminal complaint against Davis and Evins last month. 
Davis and Evins both had no comment as they left court. 
Davis was a part of the Crimson Tide’s national championship team in 2010. 
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP 
Yahoo Sports reported in 2013 that Davis was allegedly acting as an intermediary between college football stars and NFL agents and financial advisers. 
Davis declined to comment on the report at the time. 
The Associated Press contributed to this report. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 1.4%Fox Nation: 4.1%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 1.0%Fox Nation: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 7.2%Ryan Gaydos: 2.5%Fox Nation: 3.6%Availability Heuristic7.2%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.8%Fox Nation: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.9%Fox Nation: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.3%Fox Nation: 3.0%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 4.4%Ryan Gaydos: 7.3%Fox Nation: 11.9%Framing Effect4.4%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.7%Fox Nation: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.9%Fox Nation: 0.9%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 2.3%Fox Nation: 2.8%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 1.9%Fox Nation: 1.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 6.6%Ryan Gaydos: 11.0%Fox Nation: 10.8%Negativity Bias6.6%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 4.2%Fox Nation: 2.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 1.2%Fox Nation: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.4%Fox Nation: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 1.3%Fox Nation: 3.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 1.2%Fox Nation: 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 4.1%Ryan Gaydos: 2.5%Fox Nation: 2.9%Halo Effect4.1%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 2.6%Fox Nation: 1.4%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 7.2%Ryan Gaydos: 0.5%Fox Nation: 0.5%Primacy Effect7.2%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 1.1%Fox Nation: 2.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.9%Fox Nation: 0.7%Straw Man0.0%This article: 26.7%Ryan Gaydos: 3.7%Fox Nation: 5.1%Appeal to Authority26.7%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 1.6%Fox Nation: 1.8%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 1.2%Fox Nation: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 5.2%Fox Nation: 6.1%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.6%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 7.5%Fox Nation: 7.8%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 1.6%Fox Nation: 1.3%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 7.2%Ryan Gaydos: 3.0%Fox Nation: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)7.2%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.4%Fox Nation: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.4%Fox Nation: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 2.3%Fox Nation: 2.4%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 6.3%Ryan Gaydos: 1.4%Fox Nation: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)6.3%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.4%Fox Nation: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.4%Fox Nation: 0.6%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 1.6%Ryan Gaydos: 1.4%Fox Nation: 1.8%Unattributed Quote1.6%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 1.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 4.5%Fox Nation: 6.2%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 1.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.9%Fox Nation: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 7.2%Ryan Gaydos: 0.4%Fox Nation: 3.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias7.2%This article: 9.7%Ryan Gaydos: 2.2%Fox Nation: 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…9.7%

318 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers29%attributed speech226writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageC. Brock Brockington • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageC. Brock Brockington • 5 words • 100.0% coverageC. Brock Brockington • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageC. Brock Brockington • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageYahoo Sports • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageAssociated Press • 7 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Yahoo Sports

100%flagged-word coverage
23 attributed words25% of attributed speech66% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Politically Right Leaning +100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Yahoo Sports: 100.0%100.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -13.7 ptsWriter: 13.7%Yahoo Sports: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.