Topic summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos2,764 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Coffee Shops results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 21.5% saturation with 3,886 hits. Analysis detected 18,646 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,048 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠41% (9,332 of 15,753 topics). This Coffee Shops is better (less manipulative) than 59.20% of the peer group.
Coffee Shops
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 18,048
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

41% percentile
025507510040.8% percentile
2.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles18K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.3%3.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.0%1.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 21.5%21.5%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 11.6%11.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.9%7.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 12.8%12.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.5%1.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 21.5%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 6.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos