Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Pamela Chelin results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , Halo Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 20.4% saturation with 1,959 hits . Analysis detected 9,029 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,592 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,170 authors). This Pamela Chelin is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Pamela Chelin
Author details
Total words: 9,592
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles9.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.7% 0.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 20.4% 20.4% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 15.0% 15.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 12.7% 12.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 11.2% 11.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 20.4%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.2%, sitewide 15.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 15.0%, sitewide 0.5% Halo Effect: Author 12.7%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Nature: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst