Topic summary
51% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,785 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Coast Guard results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 650 hits . Analysis detected 4,334 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,382 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 31% (11,548 of 16,562 topics). This Coast Guard is better (less manipulative) than 69.70% of the peer group. Coast Guard
Topic details
Total words: 6,382
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
30% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 30.3% percentile 2.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 10.2% 10.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 4.4% 4.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 7.6% 7.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 6.4% 6.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Genetic Fallacy: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.4% Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.4% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst