Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 379 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lucas Y. Tomlinson results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 71.5% saturation with 542 hits . Analysis detected 1,938 faulty-reasoning hits from 758 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 13.5% and a BS Rank of 97% (204 of 6,628 authors). This Lucas Y. Tomlinson is worse (more manipulative) than 96.90% of the peer group. Lucas Y. Tomlinson
Author details
Total words: 758
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
97% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 96.9% percentile 13.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles758 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–100%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 71.5% 71.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 24.5% 24.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 20.6% 20.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 20.2% 20.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 10.3% 10.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 22.7% 22.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 23.4% 23.4% Genetic Fallacy Sitewide 1.4% Author 5.4% 5.4% Primacy Effect Sitewide 0.9% Author 4.2% 4.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% 80% 80% 100% 100% Framing Effect: Author 71.5%, sitewide 26.9% In-Group Bias: Author 24.5%, sitewide 6.9% Negativity Bias: Author 23.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 22.7%, sitewide 15.9% Anchoring Bias: Author 20.6%, sitewide 4.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 20.2%, sitewide 11.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 10.3%, sitewide 3.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 9.0%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Author 8.2%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 7.1%, sitewide 7.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.2%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 6.0% Recency Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 2.7% Genetic Fallacy: Author 5.4%, sitewide 1.4% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Primacy Effect: Author 4.2%, sitewide 0.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 3.7% Red Herring: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst