Topic summary
⁠90%1 analyzed article/video1,288 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Clinical Tools results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.9% saturation with 537 hits. Analysis detected 3,528 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,864 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠41% (9,885 of 16,562 topics). This Clinical Tools is better (less manipulative) than 59.70% of the peer group.
Clinical Tools
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,864
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

40% percentile
025507510040.3% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.5%10.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.8%5.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.1%5.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.9%13.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.3%3.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.2%2.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.2%3.2%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 3.8%3.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.2%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos