Topic summary
⁠86%4 analyzed articles/videos3,137 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Climate Crisis results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Availability Heuristic, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 15.4% saturation with 2,075 hits. Analysis detected 14,690 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,481 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠44% (9,395 of 16,562 topics). This Climate Crisis is better (less manipulative) than 56.70% of the peer group.
Climate Crisis
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 13,481
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

43% percentile
025507510043.3% percentile
2.7% BS Score4 analyzed articles13.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.1%7.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 15.4%15.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.0%9.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.1%0.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 14.1%14.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.3%6.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.0%4.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 14.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Topic 15.4%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.3%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos