Topic summary
⁠65%3 analyzed articles/videos1,796 analyzed words
BS Summary: These City Of Houston results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, In-Group Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 6.4% saturation with 371 hits. Analysis detected 4,194 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,803 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠26% (12,351 of 16,562 topics). This City Of Houston is better (less manipulative) than 74.60% of the peer group.
City Of Houston
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,803
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

25% percentile
025507510025.4% percentile
2.1% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.7%4.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.5%2.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.2%6.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.7%5.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.4%0.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.7%2.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.4%3.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.1%Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos