Rainbows are on the verge of returning to Montrose streets 57%

By Bianca Seward19%

7/15/2026, 2:20:09 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 25 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Halo Effect, and Anecdotal, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 115 hits. Analysis detected 1,392 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,035 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 54.3% and a BS Rank of 57% (9,405 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 57.00% of the article peer group.

When the rainbow crosswalks at the intersection of Westheimer Road and Taft Street were stripped out last fall as part of a directive by the state government, Jack Valinski began making calls to restore the symbols of LGBTQIA+ pride. 
"I figured like in a month we would have had this," said Valinski, the president of the Montrose Super Neighborhood Council. 
"I never thought it would be this long." 
It's been nearly nine months since the rainbow crosswalks were removed at the direction of Texas Gov. 
Greg Abbott, who cited guidance from federal transportation officials about public safety concerns on roadways and the use of taxpayer money for political messaging. 
Now, Valinski  alongside Pride Houston 365 President Kerry Ann Morrison, Harris County Attorney Abbie Kamin, Houston Mayor John Whitmire and Houston City Council members Joe Panzarella, Mario Castillo and Alejandra Salinas  have announced that rainbows will return to the Montrose area in the form of banners hung above Westheimer. 
And they could be funded by the mayor personally, according to Valinski. 
The local officials just have one last hurdle to clear before the banners are up. 
"We now have permission from the city. 
We now have to go through the bureaucracy of CenterPoint," Valinski said. 
"From what I understand, it's just a process of getting the forms filled out and satisfying what they need because we're putting stuff on their poles." 
CenterPoint Energy, which supplies electricity to much of the Houston region and owns utility poles across the city, confirmed to Houston Public Media it received the request to hang banners. 
Valinski said the hope is to have them hung in time for the city's rescheduled Pride parade on Aug. 15, but he added it's not a guarantee. 
The annual parade, originally planned for June 6 in downtown Houston, was called off just hours before it was set to start due to rain. 
For Valinski, a co-founder of Pride Houston 365, the proposed banners are small but symbolic. 
"We're putting rags on public utility poles, but it does mean a lot," Valinski said. 
"It means a lot because our crossing was taken away from us. 
This means a lot that this will be sort of a show of who and what we are in our community." 
The plan for the banners is to hang them along Westheimer between Taft  where the original rainbow crosswalks were painted  to Montrose Boulevard. 
They will display the Intersex-Inclusive Pride flag, which was released in 2021. 
"I was there at 2 a.m. when the bulldozers came to remove the Pride crosswalk, and to be able to come back and put up these banners all along Westheimer, as opposed to just one crosswalk, is really amazing to see," Panzarella said. 
"The hope is that we can actually extend the banner district beyond its geographic footprint right now." 
<b>Who will pay for it? 
</b> 
How the installation will be funded is unclear. 
In the fall, then-city council member Abbie Kamin's office allocated $10,000 to help finance the project. 
Panzarella, who took over Kamin's city council seat in late May after winning a special election, said Tuesday the mayor's office wanted to exclude city finances from the project. 
"So it's going to be funded from private sources and that's being led by the mayor," Panzarella said. 
The mayor's office referred questions about financing to Valinski. 
"The mayor was a little bit concerned that if the city put the money in, that there would be a concern from the governor's office," Valinski said. 
"Pride Houston has money to fund it, although we're going to be raising money to help put that money back into our bucket. 
The mayor told us in a conversation when council member [Panzarella] was sworn in that he would fund it personally." 
The mayor's office did not respond to requests for comment about whether Whitmire offered to personally pay for the banners or about fears that using public funding would upset Texas' Republican leaders, including Abbott. 
<b>Banners date back to mid-90s</b> 
The crosswalks, originally painted in 2017, became a longtime symbol of support for the LGBTQIA+ community. 
They were designed to honor Alex Hill, who at age 21 was killed by a hit-and-run driver at the intersection in 2016. 
RELATED: Montrose's rainbow crosswalks are gone after Texas officials ordered their removal 
In September, the painted crosswalks were removed as part of a construction along Westheimer. 
Officials with the Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County (METRO) then repainted the crosswalks on Oct. 
1. 
But after Montrose's rainbow crosswalks were put back in place, drawing attention from the state's politically conservative leaders, Abbott ordered cities and counties to remove such messaging. 
The U.S. 
Department of Transportation had previously ordered state governments to evaluate roadways with messages, signage and other art for removal, arguing such works are distractions on roadways. 
Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy specifically called out "rainbow crosswalks" in a post on X at the time, adding, "Political banners have no place on public roads." 
The colorful crosswalks in Montrose, considered a hub for Houston's LGBTQIA+ community, were again removed on Oct. 
20. 
While working to find a way to return the rainbows to Montrose in a permanent fashion, the city found an ordinance from October 1995 designating four districts in the city  including the area in Montrose  as established banner districts. 
Valinski said after Pride Houston moved downtown more than 10 years ago, the group forgot about the banners until the rainbow crossings were removed. 
"There are banner districts throughout the city of Houston, so this should not be controversial," Kamin said. 
"This is a historical banner district that already exists. 
It was simply inactive, and we worked with the community and with the administration to revive the district and bring it back." 
Kamin said her city council office received an outpouring of support from the Montrose community to bring the rainbows back. 
"For nearly a year, we had been working with the community to make sure that the history of Montrose, but more importantly, the representation, the literal pride of our LGBTQIA community, and more broadly, our diverse Houston community is not erased," Kamin said. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 5.1%Bianca Seward: 2.0%Houston Public Media: 1.7%Confirmation Bias5.1%This article: 0.0%Bianca Seward: 0.2%Houston Public Media: 1.1%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 11.1%Bianca Seward: 2.5%Houston Public Media: 2.7%Availability Heuristic11.1%This article: 3.2%Bianca Seward: 0.7%Houston Public Media: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic3.2%This article: 0.0%Bianca Seward: 0.5%Houston Public Media: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 4.4%Bianca Seward: 0.5%Houston Public Media: 1.3%Overconfidence Bias4.4%This article: 0.0%Bianca Seward: 4.8%Houston Public Media: 4.9%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 9.1%Bianca Seward: 1.0%Houston Public Media: 0.5%Loss Aversion9.1%This article: 5.3%Bianca Seward: 0.6%Houston Public Media: 0.5%Status Quo Bias5.3%This article: 2.3%Bianca Seward: 0.1%Houston Public Media: 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect2.3%This article: 5.1%Bianca Seward: 2.4%Houston Public Media: 2.3%Optimism Bias5.1%This article: 3.4%Bianca Seward: 0.9%Houston Public Media: 0.8%Pessimism Bias3.4%This article: 3.3%Bianca Seward: 3.7%Houston Public Media: 4.7%Negativity Bias3.3%This article: 4.3%Bianca Seward: 1.6%Houston Public Media: 1.2%Self-Serving Bias4.3%This article: 2.9%Bianca Seward: 0.5%Houston Public Media: 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error2.9%This article: 0.0%Bianca Seward: 0.4%Houston Public Media: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 9.8%Bianca Seward: 2.1%Houston Public Media: 1.6%In-Group Bias9.8%This article: 0.0%Bianca Seward: 0.2%Houston Public Media: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 10.5%Bianca Seward: 1.2%Houston Public Media: 1.5%Halo Effect10.5%This article: 0.0%Bianca Seward: 0.1%Houston Public Media: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Bianca Seward: 0.0%Houston Public Media: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 1.6%Bianca Seward: 0.4%Houston Public Media: 1.2%Recency Bias1.6%This article: 0.0%Bianca Seward: 0.0%Houston Public Media: 0.2%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Bianca Seward: 0.1%Houston Public Media: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bianca Seward: 0.6%Houston Public Media: 0.6%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Bianca Seward: 0.0%Houston Public Media: 0.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 4.1%Bianca Seward: 2.3%Houston Public Media: 3.5%Appeal to Authority4.1%This article: 1.7%Bianca Seward: 0.5%Houston Public Media: 0.7%False Dilemma1.7%This article: 0.0%Bianca Seward: 0.2%Houston Public Media: 0.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Bianca Seward: 0.0%Houston Public Media: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Bianca Seward: 1.8%Houston Public Media: 2.0%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Bianca Seward: 0.1%Houston Public Media: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Bianca Seward: 0.8%Houston Public Media: 0.5%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 7.6%Bianca Seward: 5.6%Houston Public Media: 4.5%Appeal to Emotion7.6%This article: 0.9%Bianca Seward: 0.8%Houston Public Media: 0.8%Begging the Question0.9%This article: 7.5%Bianca Seward: 1.0%Houston Public Media: 1.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)7.5%This article: 0.0%Bianca Seward: 0.5%Houston Public Media: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Bianca Seward: 0.5%Houston Public Media: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Bianca Seward: 0.0%Houston Public Media: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Bianca Seward: 0.2%Houston Public Media: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 10.5%Bianca Seward: 2.2%Houston Public Media: 1.3%Anecdotal10.5%This article: 0.0%Bianca Seward: 0.0%Houston Public Media: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 5.1%Bianca Seward: 1.6%Houston Public Media: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)5.1%This article: 0.0%Bianca Seward: 0.0%Houston Public Media: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 1.6%Bianca Seward: 0.1%Houston Public Media: 0.1%Middle Ground1.6%This article: 0.0%Bianca Seward: 0.1%Houston Public Media: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Bianca Seward: 0.0%Houston Public Media: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Bianca Seward: 0.0%Houston Public Media: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 10.6%Bianca Seward: 1.3%Houston Public Media: 1.1%Unattributed Quote10.6%This article: 3.2%Bianca Seward: 1.1%Houston Public Media: 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection3.2%This article: 0.0%Bianca Seward: 0.8%Houston Public Media: 1.1%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Bianca Seward: 1.9%Houston Public Media: 1.7%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Bianca Seward: 1.0%Houston Public Media: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bianca Seward: 0.9%Houston Public Media: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bianca Seward: 0.1%Houston Public Media: 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

1035 words analyzed.

Speakers

7speakers53%attributed speech483writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 0.0% coverageJack Valinski • 21 words • 0.0% coverageJack Valinski • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 51 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageJack Valinski • 7 words • 100.0% coverageJack Valinski • 12 words • 0.0% coverageJack Valinski • 26 words • 100.0% coverageCenterPoint Energy • 30 words • 0.0% coverageJack Valinski • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageJack Valinski • 15 words • 0.0% coverageJack Valinski • 12 words • 100.0% coverageJack Valinski • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageJoe Panzarella • 43 words • 0.0% coverageJoe Panzarella • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageJoe Panzarella • 29 words • 0.0% coverageJoe Panzarella • 18 words • 0.0% coverageHouston Mayor John Whitmire • 9 words • 0.0% coverageJack Valinski • 27 words • 0.0% coverageJack Valinski • 23 words • 100.0% coverageJack Valinski • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageU.S. Department of Transportation • 26 words • 0.0% coverageSean Duffy • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 41 words • 0.0% coverageJack Valinski • 24 words • 0.0% coverageAbbie Kamin • 17 words • 0.0% coverageAbbie Kamin • 9 words • 100.0% coverageAbbie Kamin • 22 words • 0.0% coverageAbbie Kamin • 20 words • 0.0% coverageAbbie Kamin • 43 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Abbie Kamin

100%flagged-word coverage
111 attributed words20% of attributed speech73% writer coverage
0%5.0%10.0%Unattributed Quote+1.3 ptsWriter: 6.8%Abbie Kamin: 8.1%8.1%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.