Topic summary
60% 4 analyzed articles/videos 1,807 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lgbtq+ results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.7% saturation with 1,397 hits . Analysis detected 11,256 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,485 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 39% (10,189 of 16,562 topics). This Lgbtq+ is better (less manipulative) than 61.50% of the peer group. Lgbtq+
Topic details
Total words: 9,485
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
39% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 38.5% percentile 2.5% BS Score4 analyzed articles9.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.9% 8.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.8% 6.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 14.7% 14.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 7.7% 7.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Topic 6.1% 6.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 14.7%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 1.4% Optimism Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Straw Man: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.1% Ad Hominem: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst