Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video588 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Malcolm Clark results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Politically Right Leaning Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 55% saturation with 1,293 hits. Analysis detected 6,233 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,352 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7% and a BS Rank of 91% (634 of 6,364 authors). This Malcolm Clark is worse (more manipulative) than 90.10% of the peer group.
Malcolm Clark
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
91%Malcolm Clark (selected)7%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,352
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

90% percentile
025507510090.1% percentile
7.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 55.0%55.0%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Author 24.4%24.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 21.9%21.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.6%0.6%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Author 11.3%11.3%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Author 12.5%12.5%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Author 10.3%10.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.0%2.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 6.0%6.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Biased Writer Voice: Author 55.0%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Author 28.0%, sitewide 26.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 24.4%, sitewide 1.4%Negativity Bias: Author 21.9%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Author 21.9%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Author 17.0%, sitewide 15.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 12.5%, sitewide 3.1%Straw Man: Author 11.3%, sitewide 0.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.6%, sitewide 11.1%Ad Hominem: Author 10.3%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Author 6.0%, sitewide 0.0%Slippery Slope: Author 5.5%, sitewide 1.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 5.3%, sitewide 1.9%Anecdotal: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos