Keyword summary
19% 92 analyzed articles/videos 61,048 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Houston results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 6.3% saturation with 16,871 hits . Analysis detected 161,602 faulty-reasoning hits from 265,847 analyzed words across 92 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 2% (34,153 of 34,832 keywords). This Houston is better (less manipulative) than 98.10% of the peer group. Houston
Keyword details
Total words: 265,847
Article count: 92
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.9% percentile 1.1% BS Score92 analyzed articles265.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst