How Astros are trying to fix Cam Smith: Outfielder sits out vs. Marlins to find rhythm in his swing 13%

By Matt Kawahara0%

7/23/2026, 12:25:09 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 12 faulty reasoning types, including Fundamental Attribution Error, Confirmation Bias, and Overconfidence Bias, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 17.4% saturation with 93 hits. Analysis detected 501 faulty-reasoning hits from 536 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 29.6% and a BS Rank of 13% (19,114 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 87.30% of the article peer group.

Cam Smith was absent from the Houston Astros lineup for its entire series against Miami this week, a hiatus manager Joe Espada said was to give the right fielder time to work on his swing with the team’s hitting coaches. 
Smith started 91 of Houston’s first 101 games in right field and before this series had not been held out of the lineup in back-to-back games. 
Going into Wednesday, Smith was hitting .130 in July and in a 1-for-28 stretch that had lowered his season slash line to .210/.283/.362. 
Before their series finale Wednesday against Miami, Smith was among a group of Astros taking early on-field batting practice at Daikin Park. 
Hitting coach Victor Rodriguez said the main objective with Smith is “creating some rhythm” in his set-up before he begins his swing. 
“Instead of staying still, create some kind of rhythm with the hands and with the body so he can get in a position to hit, instead of just sitting there and being stiff and going,” Rodriguez said. 
Lately, the Astros noted Smith collapsing on his back leg when he began his swing, creating a suboptimal path to the ball, said Rodriguez. 
He ascribed that to Smith being late on pitches and said they’ve worked the last few days on Smith “staying over” the ball against high velocity. 
“When he’s on time and he has rhythm, then he gets into that position over the ball,” Rodriguez said. 
“We’ve seen him hit balls hard all over the place and that’s what we want from him. 
We don’t want him just to be a pull guy (but) able to drive the ball to all fields like he was doing early in the season.” 
Smith’s pull rate has crept upward each month this season. 
The second-year right fielder had his best month in June, slashing .231/.276/.462 with 10 extra-base hits over 91 at-bats. 
His expected slugging percentage in July, based on contact quality, is his lowest in a month by over 100 points, per Statcast. 
Smith’s average bat speed in July is his highest of any month this season, and his swing-and-miss rate is his lowest. 
Rodriguez said he believes Smith is “making good swing decisions” but is “just not in a good position to do anything” with the pitches he attacks due to being late. 
“If he continues to have good decisions but he has rhythm, he’s on time, then we’ll see him driving the ball all over the place,” Rodriguez said. 
In the first two games against Miami, Smith entered as a late defensive replacement. 
He took one plate appearance in them and drew a walk. 
Espada indicated that Smith could return to the lineup when the Astros begin a series against the White Sox on Friday, after a team off-day. 
“He’s been working on trying to hit the ball more in the air, trying to get his body in a better position to drive the ball,” Espada said. 
“He’s hitting the ball hard but on the ground. 
Trying to get more back-spin. 
Hopefully we can make some adjustments and we’ll get him back in there.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 9.3%Matt Kawahara: 2.0%Houston Chronicle: 3.1%Confirmation Bias9.3%This article: 4.1%Matt Kawahara: 0.6%Houston Chronicle: 0.5%Anchoring Bias4.1%This article: 2.1%Matt Kawahara: 1.6%Houston Chronicle: 2.5%Availability Heuristic2.1%This article: 0.0%Matt Kawahara: 1.0%Houston Chronicle: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Kawahara: 0.0%Houston Chronicle: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 8.6%Matt Kawahara: 3.6%Houston Chronicle: 1.1%Overconfidence Bias8.6%This article: 8.6%Matt Kawahara: 2.4%Houston Chronicle: 4.4%Framing Effect8.6%This article: 0.0%Matt Kawahara: 0.0%Houston Chronicle: 0.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Kawahara: 0.0%Houston Chronicle: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Kawahara: 1.1%Houston Chronicle: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 7.1%Matt Kawahara: 8.1%Houston Chronicle: 1.7%Optimism Bias7.1%This article: 0.0%Matt Kawahara: 0.0%Houston Chronicle: 1.1%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Kawahara: 1.2%Houston Chronicle: 5.2%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Kawahara: 1.5%Houston Chronicle: 0.9%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 13.1%Matt Kawahara: 1.8%Houston Chronicle: 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error13.1%This article: 0.0%Matt Kawahara: 0.0%Houston Chronicle: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Kawahara: 0.9%Houston Chronicle: 1.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Kawahara: 0.0%Houston Chronicle: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Kawahara: 3.9%Houston Chronicle: 2.1%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Kawahara: 0.0%Houston Chronicle: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Kawahara: 0.0%Houston Chronicle: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 4.3%Matt Kawahara: 1.1%Houston Chronicle: 1.0%Recency Bias4.3%This article: 0.0%Matt Kawahara: 0.0%Houston Chronicle: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Kawahara: 0.6%Houston Chronicle: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Kawahara: 0.0%Houston Chronicle: 0.4%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Kawahara: 0.0%Houston Chronicle: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Kawahara: 2.9%Houston Chronicle: 3.1%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Kawahara: 0.0%Houston Chronicle: 0.7%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Kawahara: 0.0%Houston Chronicle: 0.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Kawahara: 0.0%Houston Chronicle: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 6.7%Matt Kawahara: 0.9%Houston Chronicle: 3.4%Hasty Generalization6.7%This article: 0.0%Matt Kawahara: 1.0%Houston Chronicle: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Kawahara: 0.8%Houston Chronicle: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Kawahara: 1.1%Houston Chronicle: 4.7%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Kawahara: 0.0%Houston Chronicle: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 17.4%Matt Kawahara: 3.1%Houston Chronicle: 1.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)17.4%This article: 0.0%Matt Kawahara: 0.0%Houston Chronicle: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Kawahara: 0.0%Houston Chronicle: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Kawahara: 0.0%Houston Chronicle: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Kawahara: 0.0%Houston Chronicle: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Kawahara: 0.0%Houston Chronicle: 2.0%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Kawahara: 0.0%Houston Chronicle: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Kawahara: 0.0%Houston Chronicle: 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Kawahara: 0.0%Houston Chronicle: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Kawahara: 0.0%Houston Chronicle: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Kawahara: 0.0%Houston Chronicle: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Kawahara: 0.0%Houston Chronicle: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Kawahara: 0.0%Houston Chronicle: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 8.2%Matt Kawahara: 1.8%Houston Chronicle: 1.0%Unattributed Quote8.2%This article: 0.0%Matt Kawahara: 0.0%Houston Chronicle: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Kawahara: 0.1%Houston Chronicle: 2.4%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 4.1%Matt Kawahara: 0.6%Houston Chronicle: 1.3%Indoctrination4.1%This article: 0.0%Matt Kawahara: 0.0%Houston Chronicle: 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Kawahara: 0.0%Houston Chronicle: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Kawahara: 0.0%Houston Chronicle: 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

536 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers49%attributed speech271writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageVictor Rodriguez • 22 words • 100.0% coverageVictor Rodriguez • 37 words • 0.0% coverageVictor Rodriguez • 24 words • 0.0% coverageVictor Rodriguez • 26 words • 0.0% coverageVictor Rodriguez • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageVictor Rodriguez • 30 words • 0.0% coverageVictor Rodriguez • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageEspada • 25 words • 0.0% coverageEspada • 28 words • 0.0% coverageEspada • 9 words • 0.0% coverageEspada • 5 words • 0.0% coverageEspada • 13 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Victor Rodriguez

100%flagged-word coverage
185 attributed words70% of attributed speech52% writer coverage
0%10.0%20.0%Unattributed Quote-16.2 ptsWriter: 16.2%Victor Rodriguez: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination+11.9 ptsWriter: 0.0%Victor Rodriguez: 11.9%11.9%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.