Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Matt Kawahara results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Overconfidence Bias , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 8.1% saturation with 313 hits . Analysis detected 1,689 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,882 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,208 authors). This Matt Kawahara is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Matt Kawahara
Author details
Total words: 3,882
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.4% 2.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.9% 0.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.0% 2.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.1% 0.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.9%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Author 8.1%, sitewide 6.0% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.9%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.1%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.1% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.3% Red Herring: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.7% Blind-Spot Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.2% Indoctrination: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst