Topic summary
0% 24 analyzed articles/videos 18,801 analyzed words
BS Summary: These City results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Halo Effect , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 6,818 hits . Analysis detected 62,892 faulty-reasoning hits from 73,928 analyzed words across 24 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 12% (13,468 of 15,257 topics). This City is better (less manipulative) than 88.30% of the peer group. City
Topic details
Total words: 73,928
Article count: 24
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
12% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 11.7% percentile 1.7% BS Score24 analyzed articles73.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.3% 7.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.0% 5.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 9.2% 9.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 11.1% Anecdotal: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 5.2% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst