Author summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos3,008 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jessica Bradley results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 4.3% saturation with 384 hits. Analysis detected 4,282 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,024 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠9% (6,033 of 6,628 authors). This Jessica Bradley is better (less manipulative) than 91.00% of the peer group.
Jessica Bradley
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Jacob Owens1%
⁠1%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠9%Jessica Bradley (selected)2%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 9,024
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

9% percentile
02550751009.0% percentile
1.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.4%3.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 1.2%1.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.7%1.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.3%4.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.2%0.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.6%1.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.9%0.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.1%0.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.3%3.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.0%, sitewide 3.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Nature: Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos