Topic summary
⁠62%3 analyzed articles/videos1,530 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Church Leadership results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Halo Effect, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 7.7% saturation with 600 hits. Analysis detected 7,516 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,818 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (10,507 of 16,562 topics). This Church Leadership is better (less manipulative) than 63.40% of the peer group.
Church Leadership
Topic details
Total words: 7,818
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

37% percentile
025507510036.6% percentile
2.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.6%6.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.9%2.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.7%7.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.5%0.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.1%2.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.9%4.9%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 0.4%0.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.7%2.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.3%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 4.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos