Topic summary
⁠81%4 analyzed articles/videos2,423 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chinatown results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.8% saturation with 1,204 hits. Analysis detected 8,931 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,155 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠48% (8,210 of 15,770 topics). This Chinatown is better (less manipulative) than 52.10% of the peer group.
Chinatown
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 8,155
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

48% percentile
025507510047.9% percentile
2.9% BS Score4 analyzed articles8.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.5%4.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 14.8%14.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.4%6.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.3%5.3%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 5.7%5.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 8.0%8.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 4.2%4.2%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 0.1%0.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 5.0%5.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 14.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 6.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 1.9%Anecdotal: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.2%Bandwagon: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos