Gothamist77%

Dispatches from NYC's bustling Chinatown on Christmas Day0%

By Hannah Frishberg0%

12/25/2025, 10:07:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 16 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Anecdotal, and Appeal to Authority, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 24.5% saturation with 117 hits. Analysis detected 755 faulty-reasoning hits from 477 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the article peer group.

According to the Jewish calendar, the year is 5786. 
According to the Chinese calendar, the year is 4723. 
And so, the saying goes, the Jews had to wait over 1,000 years to have Chinese food  and more than 3,000 to have it on Christmas. 
We have wasted no time since, at least not in New York. 
Though the streets were barren most elsewhere in the boroughs this Christmas Day, Manhattan’s Chinatown was bustling. 
Mott Street looked like a winter block party. 
Walking down Canal Street was, at points, more akin to standing in a line. 
Actual lines and line-like clumps wrapped outside some of the more popular eateries: Joe’s Shanghai, Mei Lai Wah Bakery, House of Joy Restaurant. 
Nom Wah Tea Parlor was prepared for the crush, and put out stanchions, bringing some order to its throngs of hungry, waiting patrons. 
“It’s the most busiest day in the year,” said Stephen Li, co-owner of longtime local favorite Great N.Y. Noodletown. 
“Most of the restaurants in New York City [are] closed, so everybody comes down to Chinatown, to celebrate Christmas.” 
“Every year, it’s the busiest day,” he said. 
In large part, this business is thanks to Jews. 
This is due to reasons of both practicality (Chinese food is among the only open food options on Christmas Day) and tradition  back in the day, specifically the 19th century, the Jewish and Chinese communities composed the two biggest non-Christian immigrant groups on the Lower East Side and came to form certain practices around one another. 
The history was recently highlighted in the Beverly Press. 
For Li, working the holiday has become something of a personal tradition. 
He’s worked Christmas Day for the last 30 years. 
“I almost forgot Christmas, because I don’t have Christmas to celebrate,” he said with a chuckle as customers lined up behind the cashier. 
“My family is celebrating during Christmas, but I’m not. 
I’m the only one that still has to work here.” 
But, for some regulars, nothing says Christmas like Great N.Y. Noodletown. 
“We come to Noodletown for every holiday,” said Marion Schultheis over a plate of lemon chicken. 
Her and her husband Bob have been coming down here from the Upper East Side regularly for years. 
“We’ll be here again in February, for Chinese New Year’s” as well as most other major holidays, she said. 
For Michael Zwilinske, the Noodletown tradition is a bit newer. 
“My partner usually takes me over here to get some chicken over rice,” said Zwilinske, an FDNY paramedic, after successfully parallel parking his ambulance directly in front of the restaurant. 
He worked the Christmas shift last year too, and visited Noodletown then as well. 
He doesn’t come around Chinatown much, he said, but is excited about his burgeoning holiday tradition  and said he’ll probably come back again next Christmas, so long as he’s on the clock. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 6.7%Hannah Frishberg: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias6.7%This article: 11.9%Hannah Frishberg: 3.1%Gothamist: 1.5%Anchoring Bias11.9%This article: 4.8%Hannah Frishberg: 5.2%Gothamist: 3.6%Availability Heuristic4.8%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 24.5%Hannah Frishberg: 2.6%Gothamist: 2.7%Confirmation Bias24.5%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 22.9%Hannah Frishberg: 14.4%Gothamist: 8.4%Framing Effect22.9%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 0.6%Gothamist: 1.0%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 6.3%Hannah Frishberg: 6.6%Gothamist: 2.1%Halo Effect6.3%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 0.5%Gothamist: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 4.8%Hannah Frishberg: 4.3%Gothamist: 2.1%In-Group Bias4.8%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 2.0%Gothamist: 1.2%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 5.5%Gothamist: 8.5%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 9.4%Hannah Frishberg: 5.9%Gothamist: 3.6%Optimism Bias9.4%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 0.9%Gothamist: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 7.8%Hannah Frishberg: 2.0%Gothamist: 1.2%Overconfidence Bias7.8%This article: 6.9%Hannah Frishberg: 1.8%Gothamist: 1.7%Pessimism Bias6.9%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 0.7%Gothamist: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 10.9%Hannah Frishberg: 2.8%Gothamist: 1.3%Recency Bias10.9%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 1.7%Gothamist: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 2.4%Gothamist: 2.6%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 2.4%Gothamist: 1.1%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 0.6%Gothamist: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 0.2%Gothamist: 1.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 1.1%Gothamist: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 15.3%Hannah Frishberg: 6.5%Gothamist: 2.8%Anecdotal15.3%This article: 12.2%Hannah Frishberg: 5.2%Gothamist: 4.4%Appeal to Authority12.2%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 6.8%Gothamist: 6.4%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 0.5%Gothamist: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 4.0%Hannah Frishberg: 2.9%Gothamist: 0.8%Bandwagon4.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 0.3%Gothamist: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 0.3%Gothamist: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 0.6%Gothamist: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 0.8%Gothamist: 1.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 4.0%Hannah Frishberg: 7.0%Gothamist: 3.8%Hasty Generalization4.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 5.9%Hannah Frishberg: 2.3%Gothamist: 2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)5.9%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 0.6%Gothamist: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Hannah Frishberg: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%

477 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.