Topic summary
⁠67%4 analyzed articles/videos1,557 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Child Safety Online results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Slippery Slope, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 16.7% saturation with 1,119 hits. Analysis detected 7,768 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,711 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠50% (8,300 of 16,562 topics). This Child Safety Online is better (less manipulative) than 50.10% of the peer group.
Child Safety Online
Topic details
Total words: 6,711
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

50% percentile
025507510049.9% percentile
3.0% BS Score4 analyzed articles6.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.9%4.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 16.7%16.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.1%5.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.1%0.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.4%5.4%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 7.0%7.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.2%0.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.7%4.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 14.9%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 16.7%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 7.5%Slippery Slope: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 1.7%Halo Effect: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 2.2%Anecdotal: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Begging the Question: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Bandwagon: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos