Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 462 analyzed words
BS Summary: These ANDREW WILKS results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Bandwagon , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 14.4% saturation with 199 hits . Analysis detected 1,207 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,386 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.1% and a BS Rank of 84% (1,078 of 6,628 authors). This ANDREW WILKS is worse (more manipulative) than 83.70% of the peer group. ANDREW WILKS
Author details
Total words: 1,386
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
84% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 83.7% percentile 5.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.3% 3.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.4% 10.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.4% 7.4% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Author 10.5% 10.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 14.4% 14.4% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 6.8% 6.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.9% 4.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.4% 4.4% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 4.0% 4.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.4%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 14.4%, sitewide 9.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Bandwagon: Author 10.5%, sitewide 2.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 7.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.8%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Horn Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.0% Indoctrination: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst