Topic summary
0%7 analyzed articles/videos3,143 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Child Care results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.5% saturation with 2,602 hits. Analysis detected 23,498 faulty-reasoning hits from 20,795 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 35% (10,488 of 16,104 topics). This Child Care is better (less manipulative) than 65.10% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

35% percentile
025507510034.9% percentile
2.4% BS Score7 analyzed articles20.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.8%9.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.5%12.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.8%9.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 11.0%11.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.4%5.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.5%4.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate