Topic summary
0% 7 analyzed articles/videos 3,143 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Child Care results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.5% saturation with 2,602 hits . Analysis detected 23,498 faulty-reasoning hits from 20,795 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 35% (10,488 of 16,104 topics). This Child Care is better (less manipulative) than 65.10% of the peer group. Child Care
Topic details
Total words: 20,795
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
35% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 34.9% percentile 2.4% BS Score7 analyzed articles20.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.8% 9.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 12.5% 12.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 9.8% 9.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 11.0% 11.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 5.4% 5.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 12.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Anecdotal: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 5.2% Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.5% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst