Author summary
⁠0%4 analyzed articles/videos2,382 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Francesca Fenzi results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Anecdotal, and Representativeness Heuristic, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 8.1% saturation with 816 hits. Analysis detected 5,715 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,052 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠32% (4,289 of 6,228 authors). This Francesca Fenzi is better (less manipulative) than 68.90% of the peer group.
Francesca Fenzi
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠32%Francesca Fenzi (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 10,052
Article count: 4
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

31% percentile
025507510031.1% percentile
2.0% BS Score4 analyzed articles10.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 6.8%6.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 2.9%2.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.3%2.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.2%2.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.3%2.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.1%1.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.4%2.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.5%0.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 6.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 8.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.3%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 4.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.5%Bandwagon: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.5%Slippery Slope: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos