Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 2,203 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Grace Won results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Representativeness Heuristic , and Anecdotal , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 783 hits . Analysis detected 4,580 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,812 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 25% (4,699 of 6,244 authors). This Grace Won is better (less manipulative) than 75.30% of the peer group. Grace Won
Author details
Total words: 8,812
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
25% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 24.7% percentile 1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles8.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.1% 5.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.4% 2.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.3% 1.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.5% 0.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.7% 2.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 8.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.5%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.5% Slippery Slope: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst