KQED61%

Giants’ Pride Controversy, Data Center in Pittsburg, and Youth-Backed Improvements to SF Bus Route 15%

By Ericka Cruz Guevarra0% Francesca Fenzi0% Alan Montecillo0%

6/29/2026, 10:00:53 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 9 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 51.1% saturation with 67 hits. Analysis detected 225 faulty-reasoning hits from 131 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 31.3% and a BS Rank of 15% (18,625 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 85.10% of the article peer group.

In this June 2026 edition of the monthly news roundup, we discuss the Giants’ pride month controversy, the debate over a new data center coming to Pittsburg, and how high school students pushed for improvements to their local bus line in San Francisco. 
Links: 
Pittsburg controversy over data center on old Delta View Golf Course 
This Bay Area suburb lost its main industry. 
Can it rebuild? 
In San Francisco, Students Become Transit Advocates to Fix ‘the City’s School Bus’ 
Fans chew out SF Giants for team’s ‘weak’ response to Pride Night saga 
Some members of the KQED podcast team are represented by The Screen Actors Guild, American Federation of Television and Radio Artists, San Francisco-Northern California Local. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 1.4%CalMatters: 1.9%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 1.6%CalMatters: 0.9%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 4.7%CalMatters: 3.0%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 1.8%CalMatters: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 0.1%CalMatters: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 0.0%CalMatters: 1.2%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 42.7%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 13.1%CalMatters: 6.3%Framing Effect42.7%This article: 0.0%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 0.8%CalMatters: 1.0%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 0.5%CalMatters: 0.7%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 2.2%CalMatters: 3.5%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 8.4%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 2.8%CalMatters: 1.4%Pessimism Bias8.4%This article: 18.3%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 10.4%CalMatters: 6.4%Negativity Bias18.3%This article: 0.0%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 0.2%CalMatters: 1.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 0.3%CalMatters: 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 3.1%CalMatters: 1.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 1.4%CalMatters: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 4.2%CalMatters: 2.7%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 0.3%CalMatters: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 2.4%CalMatters: 0.9%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 0.7%CalMatters: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 0.5%CalMatters: 0.6%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 0.3%CalMatters: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 1.7%CalMatters: 3.1%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 2.3%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 2.6%CalMatters: 1.1%False Dilemma2.3%This article: 0.0%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 0.1%CalMatters: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 3.9%CalMatters: 3.6%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 0.4%CalMatters: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 9.9%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 0.3%CalMatters: 0.7%Bandwagon9.9%This article: 0.0%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 4.1%CalMatters: 5.3%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 0.4%CalMatters: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 2.5%CalMatters: 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 0.5%CalMatters: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 0.2%CalMatters: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 0.3%CalMatters: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 0.4%CalMatters: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 2.7%CalMatters: 3.1%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 1.1%CalMatters: 1.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 0.1%CalMatters: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 0.6%CalMatters: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 4.2%CalMatters: 0.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 9.9%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 1.0%CalMatters: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection9.9%This article: 51.1%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 7.9%CalMatters: 3.1%Biased Writer Voice51.1%This article: 9.9%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 0.9%CalMatters: 1.9%Indoctrination9.9%This article: 0.0%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 2.0%CalMatters: 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 0.3%CalMatters: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 19.1%Ericka Cruz Guevarra: 1.4%CalMatters: 1.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…19.1%

131 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker19%attributed speech106writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 43 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageKQED • 25 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

KQED

100%flagged-word coverage
25 attributed words100% of attributed speech86% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Attempt to Sell a Product +100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%KQED: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-63.2 ptsWriter: 63.2%KQED: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-12.3 ptsWriter: 12.3%KQED: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-12.3 ptsWriter: 12.3%KQED: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.