Keyword summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,441 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pittsburg results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Anecdotal, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 16.5% saturation with 1,040 hits. Analysis detected 3,712 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,288 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠24% (28,810 of 37,536 keywords). This Pittsburg is better (less manipulative) than 76.80% of the peer group.
Pittsburg
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠24%Pittsburg (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

23% percentile
025507510023.2% percentile
2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.2%5.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 16.5%16.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.1%0.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 19.2%Optimism Bias: Keyword 16.5%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos