Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,319 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Giants results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Overconfidence Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 19.6% saturation with 1,138 hits . Analysis detected 7,436 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,800 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 68% (12,268 of 37,536 keywords). This Giants is worse (more manipulative) than 67.30% of the peer group. Giants
Keyword details
Total words: 5,800
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
67% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 67.3% percentile 3.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 19.6% 19.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 14.9% 14.9% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 9.0% 9.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 19.6%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 15.9% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 14.9%, sitewide 4.6% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 1.9% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 5.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 1.1% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.5% Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst