Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,319 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Giants results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Overconfidence Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 19.6% saturation with 1,138 hits. Analysis detected 7,436 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,800 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 68% (12,268 of 37,536 keywords). This Giants is worse (more manipulative) than 67.30% of the peer group.
Giants
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
68%Giants (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,800
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

67% percentile
025507510067.3% percentile
3.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.0%6.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 19.6%19.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.1%5.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 14.9%14.9%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 9.0%9.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.5%3.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.7%1.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 19.6%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 15.9%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 14.9%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 1.9%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 1.1%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.5%Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate