Author summary
0%7 analyzed articles/videos5,608 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Daisy Nguyen results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 2,473 hits. Analysis detected 22,120 faulty-reasoning hits from 26,077 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 24% (4,800 of 6,244 authors). This Daisy Nguyen is better (less manipulative) than 76.90% of the peer group.
Daisy Nguyen
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
24%Daisy Nguyen (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 26,077
Article count: 7
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

23% percentile
025507510023.1% percentile
1.8% BS Score7 analyzed articles26.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 7.3%7.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 7.9%7.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.0%3.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 8.2%8.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.3%3.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.3%2.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.8%1.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 9.5%9.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 7.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 7.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Author 9.5%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Loss Aversion: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate