Topic summary
87% 2 analyzed articles/videos 351 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cheryl Hines results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem , Biased Writer Voice , and Politically Left Leaning Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 32.4% saturation with 1,237 hits . Analysis detected 6,418 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,821 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.7% and a BS Rank of 74% (4,406 of 16,562 topics). This Cheryl Hines is worse (more manipulative) than 73.40% of the peer group. Cheryl Hines
Topic details
Total words: 3,821
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
73% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 73.4% percentile 4.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.8% 8.8% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Topic 15.5% 15.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 32.4% 32.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 10.6% 10.6% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Topic 11.4% 11.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 13.1% 13.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 11.3% 11.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Topic 32.4%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 15.9% Ad Hominem: Topic 15.5%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 5.3% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 2.0% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 11.1% Unattributed Quote: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 1.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Burden of Proof: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.4% False Dilemma: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst