Topic summary
21%5 analyzed articles/videos4,193 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Character Analysis results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 22.7% saturation with 3,061 hits. Analysis detected 11,652 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,467 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 27% (11,681 of 15,885 topics). This Character Analysis is better (less manipulative) than 73.50% of the peer group.
Character Analysis
Topic details
Total words: 13,467
Article count: 5
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

27% percentile
025507510026.5% percentile
2.1% BS Score5 analyzed articles13.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 22.7%22.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.2%4.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.8%1.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.5%3.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 22.7%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.6%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate