Author summary
87% 1 analyzed article/video 1,094 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dan Girolamo results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 33.1% saturation with 1,085 hits . Analysis detected 3,608 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,282 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 61% (2,559 of 6,540 authors). This Dan Girolamo is worse (more manipulative) than 60.90% of the peer group. Dan Girolamo
Author details
Total words: 3,282
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
61% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 60.9% percentile 3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 33.1% 33.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.6% 0.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.9% 2.9% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 4.9% 4.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 33.1%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.6%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Author 9.7%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.5%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 4.5%, sitewide 5.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 4.9%, sitewide 1.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 3.7% Bandwagon: Author 3.8%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.7% Indoctrination: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst