Topic summary
⁠21%3 analyzed articles/videos2,199 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Championships results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 875 hits. Analysis detected 7,099 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,649 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠17% (13,831 of 16,562 topics). This Championships is better (less manipulative) than 83.50% of the peer group.
Championships

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

17% percentile
025507510016.5% percentile
1.8% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.0%6.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.3%3.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.3%1.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 8.6%8.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.8%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.0%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos