Topic summary
62% 7 analyzed articles/videos 2,776 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Central Banking results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias , Slippery Slope , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 13% saturation with 1,891 hits . Analysis detected 15,665 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,506 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 38% (10,266 of 16,562 topics). This Central Banking is better (less manipulative) than 62.00% of the peer group. Central Banking
Topic details
Total words: 14,506
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
38% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 38.0% percentile 2.5% BS Score7 analyzed articles14.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.6% 7.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.1% 7.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.3% 6.3% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Topic 10.9% 10.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 13.0% 13.0% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Topic 8.8% 8.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.4% 0.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Pessimism Bias: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 1.9% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Slippery Slope: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 1.7% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.0% Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst