Topic summary
68% 5 analyzed articles/videos 2,727 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Celebrity Relationships results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 1,323 hits . Analysis detected 11,994 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,714 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 38% (10,356 of 16,562 topics). This Celebrity Relationships is better (less manipulative) than 62.50% of the peer group. Celebrity Relationships
Topic details
Total words: 11,714
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
38% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 37.5% percentile 2.4% BS Score5 analyzed articles11.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.2% 6.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.1% 5.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 11.3% 11.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.6% 4.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.3% 3.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 8.7% 8.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 15.9% Unattributed Quote: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 1.1% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Recency Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.4% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst