Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,041 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kinta Walsh-cotton results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Framing Effect , and Biased Writer Voice , with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 475 hits . Analysis detected 3,542 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,164 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 54% (3,064 of 6,628 authors). This Kinta Walsh-cotton is worse (more manipulative) than 53.80% of the peer group. Kinta Walsh-cotton
Author details
Total words: 4,164
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
54% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 53.8% percentile 2.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.5% 7.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.7% 1.7% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 11.4% 11.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.7%, sitewide 15.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 11.4%, sitewide 1.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 8.1%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Author 4.7%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Recency Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.9%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Red Herring: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst