Topic summary
34%3 analyzed articles/videos1,318 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Casualties results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Confirmation Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.1% saturation with 1,157 hits. Analysis detected 7,524 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,678 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 36% (10,171 of 15,764 topics). This Casualties is better (less manipulative) than 64.50% of the peer group.
Casualties
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 7,678
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

36% percentile
025507510035.5% percentile
2.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.8%5.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.7%4.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 5.9%5.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.4%6.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.5%9.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 15.1%15.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 2.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate