Topic summary
⁠29%3 analyzed articles/videos1,406 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cardiovascular Disease results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Optimism Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.9% saturation with 668 hits. Analysis detected 7,613 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,650 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠20% (13,401 of 16,562 topics). This Cardiovascular Disease is better (less manipulative) than 80.90% of the peer group.
Cardiovascular Disease
Topic details
Total words: 9,650
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

19% percentile
025507510019.1% percentile
1.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.3%3.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.9%6.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.9%4.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.2%3.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 6.0%6.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.9%2.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos