Author summary
0% 10 analyzed articles/videos 959 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matt Galloway results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15.9% saturation with 782 hits . Analysis detected 6,467 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,920 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 70% (2,037 of 6,629 authors). This Matt Galloway is worse (more manipulative) than 69.30% of the peer group. Matt Galloway
Author details
Total words: 4,920
Article count: 10
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
69% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 69.3% percentile 3.6% BS Score10 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 14.8% 14.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 15.9% 15.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.9% 5.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 13.0% 13.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 6.0% 6.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.9% 2.9% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 4.8% 4.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.2% 0.2% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 14.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 13.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.9%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 15.9%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 11.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 8.0%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Author 8.4%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Indoctrination: Author 6.0%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 5.8%, sitewide 5.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 4.8%, sitewide 0.5% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst