Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,185 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Carbon Sequestration results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.5% saturation with 354 hits. Analysis detected 2,726 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,740 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠19% (13,503 of 16,559 topics). This Carbon Sequestration is better (less manipulative) than 81.50% of the peer group.
Carbon Sequestration
Topic details
Total words: 4,740
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

19% percentile
025507510018.5% percentile
1.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.5%7.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.0%2.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.7%4.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.4%1.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.2%1.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.4%0.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.3%2.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.6%4.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.7%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos