Topic summary
⁠86%4 analyzed articles/videos2,893 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Campus Politics results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 21.7% saturation with 3,278 hits. Analysis detected 24,207 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,115 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠57% (7,116 of 16,562 topics). This Campus Politics is worse (more manipulative) than 57.00% of the peer group.
Campus Politics
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 15,115
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

57% percentile
025507510057.0% percentile
3.3% BS Score4 analyzed articles15.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 21.7%21.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.7%7.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 20.3%20.3%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 8.2%8.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 5.3%5.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 20.3%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 21.7%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 16.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 7.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 2.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%False Dilemma: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 1.5%Anecdotal: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.6%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.3%Straw Man: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.9%Begging the Question: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos