Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 935 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sara Beth Caddell results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and In-Group Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 31.9% saturation with 597 hits . Analysis detected 4,944 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,870 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.4% and a BS Rank of 94% (398 of 6,628 authors). This Sara Beth Caddell is worse (more manipulative) than 94.00% of the peer group. Sara Beth Caddell
Author details
Total words: 1,870
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
94% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 94.0% percentile 9.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 29.9% 29.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 30.2% 30.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 31.9% 31.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 31.1% 31.1% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Author 8.6% 8.6% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Author 8.0% 8.0% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Author 7.1% 7.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 31.8% 31.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 12.4% 12.4% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Author 6.5% 6.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Appeal to Emotion: Author 31.9%, sitewide 15.9% Framing Effect: Author 31.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 31.1%, sitewide 19.2% In-Group Bias: Author 30.2%, sitewide 6.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 29.9%, sitewide 3.7% Confirmation Bias: Author 12.4%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Author 8.8%, sitewide 11.1% Loss Aversion: Author 8.6%, sitewide 2.5% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.8%, sitewide 8.1% Bandwagon: Author 8.0%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Author 7.1%, sitewide 1.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 4.6% Halo Effect: Author 5.1%, sitewide 6.7% Begging the Question: Author 6.5%, sitewide 1.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Special Pleading: Author 4.7%, sitewide 0.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Author 3.7%, sitewide 2.2% Genetic Fallacy: Author 3.7%, sitewide 1.4% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst