Author summary
94% 1 analyzed article/video 610 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Anna Miller results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 30.7% saturation with 561 hits . Analysis detected 1,930 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,830 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5% and a BS Rank of 84% (1,118 of 6,628 authors). This Anna Miller is worse (more manipulative) than 83.10% of the peer group. Anna Miller
Author details
Total words: 1,830
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
83% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 83.1% percentile 5.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.5% 6.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.7% 12.7% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 5.6% 5.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.9% 1.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.9% 4.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 9.2% 9.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 30.7% 30.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.4% 2.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 30.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 12.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.2%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 5.6%, sitewide 0.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Author 4.9%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 4.1%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.5% Straw Man: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.9% Recency Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.7% Slippery Slope: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst