Topic summary
0% 4 analyzed articles/videos 2,021 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Business Ethics results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.2% saturation with 1,528 hits . Analysis detected 16,911 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,692 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 36% (10,096 of 15,565 topics). This Business Ethics is better (less manipulative) than 64.90% of the peer group. Business Ethics
Topic details
Total words: 13,692
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
35% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 35.1% percentile 2.4% BS Score4 analyzed articles13.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.9% 5.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.7% 6.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 11.2% 11.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 9.2% 9.2% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Topic 5.5% 5.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Ad Hominem: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 5.2% Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 1.1% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst