Author summary
93% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,156 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Julia Cassidy results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.8% saturation with 735 hits . Analysis detected 5,887 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,905 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 72% (1,907 of 6,605 authors). This Julia Cassidy is worse (more manipulative) than 71.10% of the peer group. Julia Cassidy
Author details
Total words: 3,905
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
71% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 71.1% percentile 3.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 14.5% 14.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.7% 1.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.3% 0.3% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 6.8% 6.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.6% 4.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.6% 1.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 12.2% 12.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 14.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 18.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 14.7%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 12.2%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.7%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.1%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 6.8%, sitewide 1.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.3%, sitewide 6.7% Ad Hominem: Author 6.3%, sitewide 2.2% Optimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 3.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Author 4.6%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.2%, sitewide 0.8% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.4% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst