Topic summary
⁠25%3 analyzed articles/videos1,588 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Business Disputes results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Framing Effect, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.7% saturation with 614 hits. Analysis detected 4,714 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,243 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠40% (10,065 of 16,558 topics). This Business Disputes is better (less manipulative) than 60.80% of the peer group.
Business Disputes
Topic details
Total words: 5,243
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

39% percentile
025507510039.2% percentile
2.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.3%7.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.1%4.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.7%11.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 8.6%8.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.2%1.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Topic 3.8%3.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 3.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Burden of Proof: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos