Author summary
32%1 analyzed article/video319 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Caroline Drew results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Fundamental Attribution Error, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Indoctrination, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 116 hits. Analysis detected 455 faulty-reasoning hits from 957 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 60% (2,600 of 6,359 authors). This Caroline Drew is worse (more manipulative) than 59.10% of the peer group.
Caroline Drew
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
60%Caroline Drew (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 957
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

59% percentile
025507510059.1% percentile
3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles957 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 0.9%0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 12.1%12.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.3%2.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.7%2.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.5%0.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 4.0%4.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 2.2%2.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 2.8%2.8%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Author 2.8%2.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 12.1%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.6%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.0%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Primacy Effect: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.9%Recency Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.1%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos