Topic summary
0% 5 analyzed articles/videos 3,356 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Building Collapse results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.1% saturation with 891 hits . Analysis detected 7,588 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,624 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 2% (16,274 of 16,562 topics). This Building Collapse is better (less manipulative) than 98.30% of the peer group. Building Collapse
Topic details
Total words: 17,624
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.7% percentile 1.1% BS Score5 analyzed articles17.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.1% 5.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst