Author summary
0%3 analyzed articles/videos1,272 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Barry Williams results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 6.3% saturation with 492 hits. Analysis detected 4,763 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,832 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 21% (5,032 of 6,357 authors). This Barry Williams is better (less manipulative) than 79.20% of the peer group.
Barry Williams
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
21%Barry Williams (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 7,832
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

21% percentile
025507510020.8% percentile
1.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.0%2.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 6.2%6.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 6.3%6.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.0%4.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.9%1.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.7%0.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.2%0.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.2%0.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 5.4%5.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 5.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 3.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate