Author summary
0%4 analyzed articles/videos4,185 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sanidhya Sharma results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 8.4% saturation with 1,219 hits. Analysis detected 12,089 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,592 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 26% (4,714 of 6,359 authors). This Sanidhya Sharma is better (less manipulative) than 74.10% of the peer group.
Sanidhya Sharma
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
26%Sanidhya Sharma (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 14,592
Article count: 4
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

26% percentile
025507510025.9% percentile
1.9% BS Score4 analyzed articles14.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.3%8.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 7.2%7.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 7.0%7.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.4%0.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.6%3.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.4%2.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 4.5%4.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 8.3%8.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 8.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 7.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 8.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 3.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate