Topic summary
⁠68%2 analyzed articles/videos1,667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Border Control results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and False Dilemma, with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 826 hits. Analysis detected 6,040 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,668 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠36% (10,571 of 16,496 topics). This Border Control is better (less manipulative) than 64.10% of the peer group.
Border Control
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 6,668
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

36% percentile
025507510035.9% percentile
2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.4%10.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.8%5.8%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 12.4%12.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.4%8.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.2%0.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.2%2.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.0%False Dilemma: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 1.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.5%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.4%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos